Dark matter makes up about 23
percent of the mass-energy content of the universe, even though we don’t
know what it is or have yet to directly see it (which is why it’s
called “dark”). So how can we detect it and when we do, what will it
reveal about the universe? In mid-October, more than 100 cosmologists,
particle physicists and astrophysicists gathered for a meeting called "Dark Matter Universe:
On the Threshold of Discovery" at the National Academy of Sciences’
Beckman Center in Irvine, CA. Their goal: to take stock of the latest
theories and findings about dark matter, assess just how close we are to
detecting it and spark cross-disciplinary discussions and
collaborations aimed at resolving the dark matter puzzle.
The image above is one of the most detailed maps of dark matter in our
universe ever created. The location of the dark matter (tinted blue) was
inferred through observations of magnified and distorted distant
galaxies seen in this picture.
"Figuring out what is dark matter has become a problem that
astrophysicists, cosmologists and particle physicists all want to solve,
because dark matter is central to our understanding of the universe,"
says Michael S. Turner –
Rauner Distinguished Service Professor and Director of the Kavli
Institute for Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago. "We now
have a compelling hypothesis, namely that dark matter is comprised of
WIMPs (Weakly Interacting Massive Particle),
particles that don’t radiate light and interact rarely with ordinary
matter. After decades of trying to figure out how to test the idea that
dark matter is made up of WIMPs, we have three ways to test this
hypothesis. Best of all, all three methods are closing in on being able
to either confirm or falsify the WIMP. So the stars have truly aligned."
A theoretical cosmologist trained in both particle physics and
astrophysics, Michael Turner coined the term “dark energy” and helped
establish the interdisciplinary field that combines cosmology and
elementary particle physics.
"Ten years ago," Turner says, "I don't
think you would've found astronomers, cosmologists, and particle
physicists all agreeing that dark matter was really important. And now,
they do. And all of them believe we can solve the problem soon. It's
wonderful listening to particle physicists explain the evidence for dark
matter, and vice versa –astronomers explaining WIMPs as dark matter. At
this meeting nobody said, “Oh, I don't really believe in the evidence.
Nor did anyone say, “Yikes – a new form of matter. That’s crazy.”
Maria Spiropulu – Professor of Physics at California Institute of Technology who also works on experiments at the Large Hadron Collider, and a former fellow at the Enrico Fermi Institute,
observed that "One important thing we’ve seen at this meeting is a
crossing of professional boundaries that have separated researchers in
many different fields in the past. These boundaries have been strict.
Cosmologists, astrophysicists and particle physicists, however, have now
really started talking to one another about dark matter. We’re only
beginning and our language – the way speak to each other – is not yet
settled so that we completely understand each other; but we are on the
threshold of discovering something very important for all of us. This is
critical because cosmologists and particle physicists have talked for a
long time about how the very big and very small might be linked. And
while the particle physicists study the very small with colliders,
cosmologists study the galaxies and billions and billions of stars that
make up the large-scale structure we see in the universe."
"The convergence of inner space and outer space really started in the
1980s, said Turner."Back then it began with the origin of the baryon
asymmetry, the monopole problem and dark matter to a lesser extent.
Particle physicists agreed that dark matter was a real problem but said,
“The solution could be astrophysics – faint stars, ‘Jupiters’, black
holes and the like.” It’s been a long road to get to where we are now,
namely where we all agree that the most compelling solution is particle
dark matter. And even today, the different fields are still, in a sense,
getting to know one another."
"As cosmologists," said Rocky Kolb, who studies the application of elementary-particle physics to the very early Universe,
and is the co-author with Michael Turner of The Early Universe, the
standard textbook on particle physics and cosmology, "one of our jobs is
to understand what the universe is made of. To a good approximation,
the galaxies and other structures we see in the universe are made
predominantly of dark matter. We have concluded this from a tremendous
body of evidence, and now we need to discover what exactly is dark
matter. The excitement now is that we are closing in on an answer, and
only once in the history of humans will someone discover it. There will
be some student or postdoc or experimentalist someplace who is going to
look in the next 10 years at their data, and of the seven or so billion
people in the world that person will discover what galaxies are mostly
made of. It's only going to happen once."
"The dark matter story started with fragmentary evidence discovered
by Fritz Zwicky, a Swiss American," Turner pointed out."He found that
there were not enough stars in the galaxy clusters he observed to hold
them together. Slowly, more was understood and finally dark matter
became a centerpiece of cosmology. And now, we have established that
dark matter is about 23 percent of the universe; ordinary matter is only
4½ percent; and dark energy is that other 73 percent – which is an even
bigger puzzle. Nothing in cosmology makes sense without dark matter. We
needed it to form galaxies, stars and other structures in the Universe.
And so it's absolutely central to cosmology. We also know that none of
the particles known to exist can be the dark matter particle. So it has
to be a new particle of nature. Remarkably, our most conservative
hypothesis right now is that the dark matter is a new form of matter –
out there to be discovered and to teach us about particle physics. An
experimental particle physicist, Maria Spiropulu is interested in the
search for dark matter at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN (The European Organization for Nuclear Research), and questions about dark matter that cut across particle physics, astrophysics and cosmology."
Maria Spiropulu added that "The phenomenon of dark matter was
discovered from astronomical observations. We know that galaxies hang
together and they don't fly apart, and it’s the same with clusters of
galaxies. So we know that we have structure in the universe. Whatever it
is that keeps it there, in whatever form it is, we call that dark
matter. This is the way I teach it to undergraduates. It’s a fantastical
story. It's still a mystery and so it’s “dark,” but the universe and
its structures – galaxies and everything else we observe in the
macroscopic world – are being held together because of it."
"Dark matter is absolutely central to cosmology, said Turner, "and
the evidence for it comes from many different measurements: the amount
of deuterium produced in the big bang, the cosmic microwave background,
the formation of structure in the Universe, galaxy rotation curves,
gravitational lensing, and on and on."
What is dark matter? We don’t know, but cosmologists, astrophysicists
and experimental particle physicists say they are closing in on an
answer.Knowing exactly what dark matter is is less important than the
work done already – measuring its gravitational influence on ordinary
matter, estimating how much of the universe is made from it, and
affirming that what we do know about it fits with the standard model of
cosmology.
"There is five times more dark matter than ordinary matter, and its
existence allows us to understand the history of the universe beginning
from a formless particle soup until where we are today," said Turner.
"If you said, 'You no longer have dark matter,' our current cosmological
model would collapse. We would be back to square one."
"The hypothesis that dark matter is made up of WIMPs – and that it
was produced by normal particles, say quarks, in the early universe – is
an amazing achievement all by itself, observed Kolb. "Independent of a
lot of the details of what goes on there and exactly how that happens,
we expect that you should be able to reverse things and produce WIMPs in
particle accelerators. We also expect they should be annihilating today
in the galaxy, which we should be able to detect indirectly. Now, it's
another issue who will be the first to find WIMPs. It's possible that it
will be another 30 years before we do that, but we should be able to
make a detection – whether it’s direct or indirect."
Marion Spiropulu answered that "With the Large Hadron Collider, and
before that the Tevatron collider, we have been chasing and targeting
the dark matter candidate. For us, the optimism is because the LHC is
working and we’re collecting a lot of data. In the standard model of
particle physics, when we enlarge it to help explain how the universe
began and evolved, we have a story that is a mathematical story. It’s
very good at describing how we can have dark matter. And if the
mathematics accurately describes reality, then the LHC is now achieving
the energies that are needed to produce dark matter particles. Getting
to these high energies is critical, and we are even going to higher
energies. When we were building the standard model of particle physics,
we kept saying that the next particle discovery that we predicted was
'right around the corner.'In other words, we were not, and we are not,
flying in the dark. We are guided by a huge amount of data and
knowledge, and while you might think there are infinite possibilities of
what can happen, the data actually points you to something that is more
probable. For example, we have found the Higgs-like particle, but that
was predicted. So the next big step for this edifice of knowledge is to
find something that will look like supersymmetry – a hypothesis that, if
true, offers a perfect candidate for dark matter. We call it a miracle,
because the mathematics works. But the way nature works, in the end, is
what you see in the data. So if we find it, there is no miracle."
"Dark matter particles, or WIMPs," said Turner, "don’t interact with
ordinary matter often. It's taken 25 years to improve the sensitivity of
our detectors by a factor of a million, and now they have a good shot
at detecting the dark matter particles. Because of the technological
developments, we think we are on the cusp of a direct detection.
Likewise for indirect detection. We now have instruments like the Fermi
satellite (the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope) and the IceCube detector
(the IceCube Neutrino Observatory at the South Pole) that can detect
the ordinary particles (positrons, gamma rays or neutrinos) that are
produced when dark matter particles annihilate, indirectly allowing dark
matter to be detected. IceCube is big enough to detect neutrinos that
are produced by dark matter annihilations in the sun."
Answering the observation that the dark matter particle might not be
detectable, Turner said that for 20 to 30 years, this idea that dark
matter is part of a unified theory has been our Holy Grail and has led
to the WIMP hypothesis and the belief that the dark matter particle is
detectable. "But there’s a new generation of physicists that is saying,
'Well, there's an alternative view. Dark matter is actually just the tip
of an iceberg of another world that is unrelated to our world. And I
cannot even tell you about that world. There are no rules for that other
world, at least that we know of yet.' Sadly, this point of view could
be correct and might mean the solution to the dark matter problem is
still very far away, that discovering what dark matter actually is could
be 100 years away.
Michael Witherell, Professor of Physics at the University of
California, Santa Barbara, said that nature doesn't guarantee an
observation, which Turner said is ture. But that we have the WIMP
hypothesis and it is falsifiable. And there's a good chance it's true. A
“good chance” in this business means 10 percent or 20 percent. *"It's
easy to say that wimps will be discovered in “A decade.” said Kolb. "LHC
is turning on now. It'll be another year or so before they are at full
energy, and they may run a couple of years to accumulate data.
Meanwhile, the Fermi satellite is in space making observations. And then
we have experiments underground: a detection may come with Xenon100,
one dark matter experiment now underway in central Italy, or some
successor to Xenon100. In ten years, if there is no indication of
supersymmetry or a WIMP – either from direct detection or indirect
detection searches – then there is going to be a sea change. Now, there
is not going to be one experiment announcement that says, 'OK, let's
look at something else.' But if ten years from now there is no evidence,
then we are going to other possibilities. You could not have said that
ten years ago, or even five years ago. Today, I think you can say that."
"I think it's fair to say the discovery is 'around the corner,” said
Spiropulu. "If we continue with exclusions, then we have to come up with
better ideas. We are doing all this because we want to characterize
dark matter. We are not just saying, “It is dark matter.” We don't want
to just say, “The universe is.” We want to know exactly what it is made
of. We want to know the dynamics and what it involves. A lot of work is
ahead of us. Somebody said that it's not going to be as easy as finding
the Higgs. Well, finding the Higgs was extremely nontrivial. Of course,
once we find it, it goes in the pool of knowledge and then you say,
“Well, it was easy.”
"Ee need to discover what exactly is dark matter. The excitement now
is that we are closing in on an answer, and only once in the history of
humans will someone discover it." said Rocky Kolb.
Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/ESA/Institute of Astrophysics of Andalusia, University of Basque Country/JHU
Source: The Daily Galaxy via http://www.kavlifoundation.org
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario